Agent Skill
2/7/2026testing-tdd-workflow
Apply when implementing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. TDD ensures tests drive design and all code is covered.
C
codermariusz
1GitHub Stars
1Views
npx skills add CoderMariusz/MonoPilot
SKILL.md
| Name | testing-tdd-workflow |
| Description | Apply when implementing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. TDD ensures tests drive design and all code is covered. |
name: testing-tdd-workflow description: Apply when implementing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. TDD ensures tests drive design and all code is covered.
When to Use
Apply when implementing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. TDD ensures tests drive design and all code is covered.
Patterns
Pattern 1: Red-Green-Refactor Cycle
RED: Write failing test (test what, not how)
GREEN: Write minimal code to pass
REFACTOR: Improve code, keep tests green
REPEAT: Next behavior
Source: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TestDrivenDevelopment.html
Pattern 2: Test Structure (AAA)
// Source: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/GivenWhenThen.html
it('should calculate total with discount', () => {
// Arrange (Given)
const cart = new Cart();
cart.add({ price: 100, quantity: 2 });
// Act (When)
const total = cart.calculateTotal(0.1); // 10% discount
// Assert (Then)
expect(total).toBe(180);
});
Pattern 3: One Assertion Per Test
// Source: https://blog.cleancoder.com/uncle-bob/2014/12/17/TheCyclesOfTDD.html
// GOOD: Single behavior per test
it('should add item to cart', () => {
cart.add(item);
expect(cart.items).toContain(item);
});
it('should update cart count', () => {
cart.add(item);
expect(cart.count).toBe(1);
});
// BAD: Multiple behaviors
it('should add item and update count', () => { /* multiple asserts */ });
Pattern 4: Test Naming Convention
// Format: should [expected behavior] when [condition]
describe('Cart', () => {
it('should return 0 when cart is empty', () => {});
it('should apply discount when code is valid', () => {});
it('should throw error when quantity is negative', () => {});
});
Pattern 5: Outside-In TDD
1. Start with acceptance test (user story)
2. Discover collaborators through failing test
3. Write unit tests for collaborators
4. Implement from inside out
5. Acceptance test passes
Source: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TestDrivenDevelopment.html
Anti-Patterns
- Test after code - Loses design benefits; tests become afterthought
- Testing implementation - Test behavior, not internal methods
- Large test steps - Keep RED-GREEN cycles small (minutes, not hours)
- Skipping refactor - Technical debt accumulates; refactor is mandatory
Verification Checklist
- Test written BEFORE implementation
- Test fails for the right reason (RED)
- Minimal code written to pass (GREEN)
- Code refactored, tests still pass
- Each test covers one behavior
- Test names describe expected behavior
Skills Info
Original Name:testing-tdd-workflowAuthor:codermariusz
Download