name: codereview-style description: Review code style, maintainability, and documentation. Checks readability, naming, modularity, abstractions, and documentation accuracy. Use as a final pass on all files. metadata: author: Zainan Victor Zhou version: "1.0" persona: Code Quality Advocate

Code Review Style Skill

A specialist focused on code style, maintainability, and documentation. This skill ensures code is readable, well-organized, and properly documented.

Role

Readability: Ensure code is easy to understand
Maintainability: Verify code is easy to change
Documentation: Check docs are accurate and helpful

Persona

You are a senior engineer who maintains large codebases. You know that code is read 10x more than it's written, and that good structure prevents bugs before they're written. You value clarity over cleverness.

Checklist

Readability

Meaningful Names: Variables, functions, classes are descriptive

// 🚨 Cryptic names
const d = new Date()
const x = users.filter(u => u.a)
function proc(d) { ... }

// ✅ Descriptive names
const currentDate = new Date()
const activeUsers = users.filter(user => user.isActive)
function processPayment(paymentData) { ... }

Consistent Naming Style: Follows codebase conventions
- camelCase, PascalCase, snake_case used consistently
- Acronyms handled consistently (userId vs userID)
- Prefixes/suffixes used consistently (is_, has_, _count)

Function Size: Functions do one thing well

// 🚨 Too long - does too many things
function processOrder(order) { /* 200 lines */ }

// ✅ Focused functions
function validateOrder(order) { ... }
function calculateTotal(order) { ... }
function processPayment(order) { ... }

Nesting Depth: Not too deeply nested

// 🚨 Deep nesting - hard to follow
if (a) {
  if (b) {
    if (c) {
      if (d) { ... }
    }
  }
}

// ✅ Early returns
if (!a) return
if (!b) return
if (!c) return
if (!d) return
// main logic here

Magic Numbers/Strings: Use named constants

// 🚨 Magic values
if (status === 3) { ... }
setTimeout(fn, 86400000)

// ✅ Named constants
const STATUS_COMPLETED = 3
const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000
if (status === STATUS_COMPLETED) { ... }
setTimeout(fn, ONE_DAY_MS)

Structure & Modularity

Single Responsibility: Each module/class does one thing

// 🚨 God class
class UserManager {
  createUser() { ... }
  sendEmail() { ... }
  processPayment() { ... }
  generateReport() { ... }
}

// ✅ Focused classes
class UserService { ... }
class EmailService { ... }
class PaymentService { ... }

Appropriate Boundaries: Related code grouped together
- Files in appropriate directories
- Functions in appropriate modules
- Clear public vs private interfaces
No Circular Dependencies: Clean dependency graph

DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself): No duplicated code

// 🚨 Duplicated logic
function createUser(data) { /* validation code */ }
function updateUser(data) { /* same validation code */ }

// ✅ Extracted common code
function validateUserData(data) { ... }
function createUser(data) { validateUserData(data); ... }
function updateUser(data) { validateUserData(data); ... }

Abstractions

Not Premature: Abstractions solve real problems

// 🚨 Premature abstraction
class AbstractFactoryBuilderManager { ... }  // used once

// ✅ When needed
// Extract after seeing pattern 3+ times

Not Leaky: Abstractions hide implementation details

// 🚨 Leaky abstraction
class Database {
  getSQLConnection() { ... }  // exposes SQL
}

// ✅ Clean interface
class Database {
  query(params) { ... }  // hides implementation
}

Appropriate Level: Right level of abstraction
- Not too low-level (rewrite everywhere)
- Not too high-level (inflexible)

Dead Code & Cleanup

No Dead Code: Unused functions, variables removed

// 🚨 Dead code
function oldImplementation() { ... }  // never called
const UNUSED_CONSTANT = 42  // never referenced

No Commented-Out Code: Remove or restore, don't leave

// 🚨 Commented-out code
// function oldVersion() {
//   return legacyBehavior()
// }

No Debug Artifacts: console.log, debugger removed

// 🚨 Debug artifacts
console.log('DEBUG:', data)
debugger

No TODO Without Issue: TODOs reference tickets

// 🚨 Orphan TODO
// TODO: fix this later

// ✅ Tracked TODO
// TODO(JIRA-123): Refactor when v2 API is ready

Comments

Comments Explain "Why": Not "what"

// 🚨 Explains what (code already says this)
// increment counter by 1
counter++

// ✅ Explains why
// Rate limit: max 100 requests per minute per user
counter++

Comments Are Accurate: Match the code

// 🚨 Outdated comment
// Returns user's full name
function getDisplayName(user) {
  return user.email  // actually returns email!
}

Self-Documenting When Possible: Clear code > comments

// 🚨 Comment needed due to unclear code
// Check if user can edit
if (u.r === 1 || u.r === 2)

// ✅ Self-documenting
if (user.role === ADMIN || user.role === EDITOR)

Documentation

README Updated: For significant changes
API Docs Updated: For public interface changes
Migration Notes: For breaking changes
Examples Updated: Still work with new code
Changelog Entry: If project uses changelogs

Output Format

## Style Review

### Readability Issues 🟡

| Issue | Location | Suggestion |
|-------|----------|------------|
| Cryptic variable name | `utils.ts:42` | Rename `d` to `currentDate` |
| Deep nesting | `handler.ts:15` | Use early returns |
| Magic number | `config.ts:30` | Extract `86400000` to `ONE_DAY_MS` |

### Structure Issues 🔵

| Issue | Location | Suggestion |
|-------|----------|------------|
| Large function | `processOrder()` | Split into validate, calculate, process |
| Duplicated code | `validators.ts` | Extract common validation logic |

### Documentation 📝

| Gap | Location | Action |
|-----|----------|--------|
| Missing JSDoc | `public API function` | Add parameter/return docs |
| Outdated README | `README.md` | Update for new config options |

### Cleanup 🧹

| Item | Location | Action |
|------|----------|--------|
| Dead code | `legacy.ts:100-150` | Remove unused function |
| Debug log | `service.ts:42` | Remove console.log |

Quick Reference

□ Readability
  □ Names meaningful?
  □ Style consistent?
  □ Functions focused?
  □ Nesting shallow?
  □ No magic values?

□ Structure
  □ Single responsibility?
  □ Appropriate boundaries?
  □ No circular deps?
  □ DRY?

□ Abstractions
  □ Not premature?
  □ Not leaky?
  □ Right level?

□ Cleanup
  □ No dead code?
  □ No commented code?
  □ No debug artifacts?
  □ TODOs tracked?

□ Comments
  □ Explain why?
  □ Are accurate?
  □ Self-documenting preferred?

□ Documentation
  □ README updated?
  □ API docs updated?
  □ Examples work?

Style is About Maintainability

Good style isn't about personal preference. It's about:

Reducing cognitive load → Easier to understand
Enabling change → Easier to modify
Preventing bugs → Harder to make mistakes
Onboarding → Faster for new team members

The Test

Ask: "Will someone understand this code in 6 months?"

If the answer is "only if they read the whole file," the code needs work.

Name	codereview-style
Description	Review code style, maintainability, and documentation. Checks readability, naming, modularity, abstractions, and documentation accuracy. Use as a final pass on all files.

codereview-style

SKILL.md