---

name: review-changes description: Review all changes on the current branch. Use when the user asks for a code review or PR review. disable-model-invocation: false inputs:

• id: branch type: currentBranch description: The branch to review

---

review-changes

Review all changes on the current branch compared to the upstream branch.

Context

{{branch}}

Determining the Base Branch

IMPORTANT: This repository uses develop as the integration branch, not master or main.

1. Use develop as the default base branch for all comparisons:

   git diff origin/develop...HEAD
   

2. Verify by checking GitHub workflows if unsure - look at .github/workflows/*.yml for pull_request.branches targets

3. Use the correct git diff syntax:

   • origin/develop...HEAD - shows changes in current branch since it diverged from develop
   • Run git log --oneline origin/develop..HEAD to see commits being reviewed

Pre-flight: Detect Change Types

Before launching subagents, analyze what files changed:

git diff origin/develop...HEAD --name-only

Conservative skip rules (only skip when 100% safe):

Reviewer	Run	Notes
reviewer-prettier	✅ Always	Formats .md, .json, .ts, .tsx, etc.
reviewer-versioning	✅ Always	Fast validation, can fail early
reviewer-changelog	✅ Always	Fast validation, can fail early
reviewer-dependencies	Conditional	Run if ANY package.json changed
reviewer-typescript	Conditional	Skip ONLY if NO .ts/.tsx in source directories changed
reviewer-eslint	Conditional	Skip ONLY if NO .ts/.tsx in source directories changed
reviewer-tests	Conditional	Skip ONLY if NO .ts/.tsx in source directories changed

When in doubt, run the check. Fast failures are better than missed issues.

Execution Strategy

IMPORTANT: Launch ALL applicable subagents in a SINGLE parallel batch. Do NOT wait for one group to finish before starting another.

In one tool call batch, launch all applicable reviewers:

• reviewer-prettier (always)
• reviewer-versioning (always)
• reviewer-changelog (always)
• reviewer-dependencies (if any package.json changed)
• reviewer-typescript (if .ts/.tsx in frontend/, service/, or common/ changed)
• reviewer-eslint (if .ts/.tsx in frontend/, service/, or common/ changed)
• reviewer-tests (if .ts/.tsx in frontend/, service/, or common/ changed)

Note: reviewer-dependencies checks changelog documentation but does NOT create/modify changelogs. If both changelog and dependency changes exist, both reviewers run in parallel - the dependency reviewer only reads existing changelogs.

Analysis Required

Check for:

Code Quality & Bugs:

• Potential bugs, edge cases, or runtime errors
• Code smells, anti-patterns, or violations of repository rules (check .cursor/rules/*)
• Newly added TODO/FIXME comments that should be addressed
• Suspicious or unclear code changes
• Business logic changes that need scrutiny

Standards & Compliance:

• Delegate to reviewer-typescript subagent to check for TypeScript errors
• Delegate to reviewer-eslint subagent to check for linting violations
• Delegate to reviewer-prettier subagent to check for formatting issues
• Breaking changes (API, props, contracts)
• Accessibility violations (keyboard nav, ARIA where applicable)

FuryStack-Specific Patterns:

• RequestError usage (proper HTTP codes: 409, 400, 401, 404, 500)
• Observable patterns (ObservableValue, subscriptions, disposal)
• Cache patterns (get, getObservable, setExplicitValue)
• Shades component patterns (shadowDomName, useObservable, useDisposable)
• Injectable services and dependency injection
• Action patterns (RequestAction, proper logging)
• Navigation patterns (navigateToRoute usage)

Shades Styling Patterns:

• Flag useState() used only for CSS-representable states (hover, focus, active)

• Recommend using css property with pseudo-selectors instead:

  // ❌ Anti-pattern to flag
  const [isHovered, setIsHovered] = useState('hover', false)
  <div onMouseEnter={() => setIsHovered(true)} style={{ opacity: isHovered ? 1 : 0.7 }} />
  
  // ✅ Recommend instead
  css: { opacity: '0.7', '&:hover': { opacity: '1' } }
  

• Static style props in Shade definitions should use css instead

Testing & Coverage:

• Delegate to reviewer-tests subagent to run unit tests and assess coverage
• Missing test coverage for new/changed code
• Test quality and edge case coverage

Performance & Security:

• Performance concerns (unnecessary re-renders, missing disposal)
• Security vulnerabilities or data exposure

Versioning & Changelog:

• Delegate to reviewer-versioning subagent to validate version bumps
• Delegate to reviewer-changelog subagent to validate changelog entries

Dependencies:

• Delegate to reviewer-dependencies subagent to validate dependency consistency across packages

Documentation:

• Missing or outdated documentation for significant changes

Subagent Output Rules

IMPORTANT: Only include subagent results in the final output if they found errors or issues.

• If reviewer-typescript passes → Do NOT mention it in the output
• If reviewer-eslint passes → Do NOT mention it in the output
• If reviewer-prettier passes → Do NOT mention it in the output
• If reviewer-tests passes → Do NOT mention it in the output
• If reviewer-versioning passes → Do NOT mention it in the output
• If reviewer-changelog passes → Do NOT mention it in the output
• If reviewer-dependencies passes → Do NOT mention it in the output

Only report subagent findings when they detect actual problems.

Output Format

1. Summary: Brief overview of changes (2-3 sentences max)

2. Issues by Priority:

• 💀 Critical: Must fix before merge
• 🔥 High: Should fix before merge
• 🤔 Medium: Consider addressing
• 💚 Low: Nice to have

For each issue, be specific: file, line, problem, suggested fix.

3. Test Coverage: Assess coverage quality. Warn if inadequate.

4. Changelog: Generate a short, consistent changelog as a copyable markdown code block.

Format:

• Use present tense, imperative mood (e.g., "Add", "Fix", "Update", "Remove")
• One line per logical change (max 5-7 lines)
• Group by type if multiple changes: Features, Fixes, Refactors
• No verbose descriptions - keep each line under 80 characters

Example:

- Add user profile validation
- Fix observable memory leak in cache
- Update dependency injection patterns

5. Pull Request Description: Generate as a copyable markdown code block with:

• Relevant emoji per header
• Brief description of what the PR does
• Remaining Tasks checklist generated from found issues (if any), grouped by priority:

## 📋 Remaining Tasks

### 💀 Critical

- [ ] Fix TypeScript error in `service/src/foo.ts:42`

### 🔥 High

- [ ] Add missing test for `handleSubmit` function

### 🤔 Medium

- [ ] Address memory leak in observable subscription

Omit empty priority sections. If no issues found, omit the entire Remaining Tasks section.

6. Learnings & Rule Updates:

At the end of the review, summarize any patterns or learnings that emerged from the review (or from user feedback during the review process) that could be codified into rules. Ask the user if they would like to:

• Update an existing rule file in .cursor/rules/
• Create a new rule file for the pattern
• Skip persisting the learning

This ensures that recurring feedback and discovered patterns are captured for future development.

Style: Be critical, specific, and concise. If unsure, ask for clarification.