name: verification-before-completion description: "Use when finishing any task. Final checklist before marking complete. Ensures nothing forgotten, all tests pass, documentation updated."

Verification Before Completion

Core Principle

Before declaring ANY work "complete" or "done", verify EVERYTHING works. This is the final gate before handoff.

When to Use This Skill

After completing code-review skill
User asks "is it done?"
BEFORE EVERY COMMIT (mandatory)
Before creating pull request
Before closing an issue
Before marking a feature as complete

The Iron Laws

1. NEVER DECLARE WORK COMPLETE WITHOUT FULL VERIFICATION

Reasons:

Ensures nothing was forgotten
Confirms everything actually works
Validates against original requirements
Prevents "one more thing" scenarios
Professional quality gate

2. NEVER COMMIT WITHOUT VERIFICATION

This skill is MANDATORY before ANY git commit.

If you find yourself typing git commit without having completed this verification checklist, STOP.

❌ FORBIDDEN:

# Making changes
vim src/file.js
git add .
git commit -m "fix stuff"  # ← WRONG! No verification!

✅ REQUIRED:

# Making changes
vim src/file.js

# MANDATORY: Run verification-before-completion skill
# Complete ALL checklist items
# Only after FULL verification passes:

git add .
git commit -m "fix(api): handle null values in user profile"

Authority: Professional teams NEVER commit without verification. Unverified commits cause:

🐛 Bugs in production
💥 Broken builds
😡 Wasted team time
💸 Lost customer trust

3. FRONTEND + BACKEND = FULL TEST SUITE

When changes affect both frontend and backend:

MANDATORY before commit:

✅ Backend tests (unit + integration)
✅ Frontend tests (component + integration)
✅ E2E tests (full user flow)
✅ API tests (if API changed)

Never commit if ANY test fails.

Verification Protocol

Step 1: Announce Verification

Template:

I'm using the verification-before-completion skill to perform final checks before declaring this complete.

Step 2: Requirements Verification

Check against original user request:

Original Request:
"[User's original request verbatim]"

Requirements Checklist:
✅ [Requirement 1] - Implemented and verified
✅ [Requirement 2] - Implemented and verified
✅ [Requirement 3] - Implemented and verified

Questions to ask:

Did I do EVERYTHING the user asked for?
Are there any "and also" or "oh and" requests I missed?
Did the requirements change during discussion?
Are there implied requirements I should have addressed?

Step 3: Functionality Verification

Test the complete feature end-to-end:

End-to-End Testing:

Scenario 1: [Happy path]
Steps:
1. [Action 1] → ✅ Works
2. [Action 2] → ✅ Works
3. [Action 3] → ✅ Works
Result: ✅ Complete flow works

Scenario 2: [Alternative path]
Steps:
1. [Action 1] → ✅ Works
2. [Action 2] → ✅ Works
Result: ✅ Alternative flow works

Scenario 3: [Error path]
Steps:
1. [Action 1] → ✅ Appropriate error
Result: ✅ Error handling works

Step 4: Test Verification

Verify ALL tests pass:

Test Verification:

Before running tests:
✅ Using database-backup skill (MANDATORY)
✅ Backup created: [filename]

Running complete test suite:
Command: ./scripts/safe-test.sh vendor/bin/paratest
Results:
- Total: [X] tests
- Passed: [X] tests
- Failed: 0 tests
- Duration: [time]
- Coverage: [X]%

✅ All tests pass

Running specific feature tests:
Command: ./scripts/safe-test.sh vendor/bin/paratest --filter=[Feature]
Results:
- Total: [Y] tests
- Passed: [Y] tests
- Failed: 0 tests

✅ Feature tests pass

If ANY tests fail:

❌ Tests failed - NOT ready for completion

Failed tests:
1. [Test name] - [Failure reason]
2. [Test name] - [Failure reason]

I need to fix these before declaring complete.

Step 5: Integration Verification

Verify integration with existing system:

Integration Verification:

✅ No existing functionality broken
✅ API contracts maintained (backwards compatible)
✅ Database migrations applied successfully
✅ Database migrations can be rolled back
✅ No conflicts with other features
✅ Environment variables documented
✅ Dependencies up to date

Run regression tests:

Running full test suite to ensure nothing broke:
Command: ./scripts/safe-test.sh vendor/bin/paratest
Results: ✅ [X] tests, all passed

Step 6: Documentation Verification

Verify all documentation is complete:

Documentation Checklist:

Code Documentation:
✅ PHPDoc/JSDoc comments on all public methods
✅ Complex logic has explanatory comments
✅ Type hints on all function parameters

API Documentation:
✅ OpenAPI/Swagger documentation generated
✅ All endpoints documented
✅ Request/response examples provided
✅ Authentication requirements noted
✅ Error responses documented

Project Documentation:
✅ README.md updated (if new feature/setup)
✅ CHANGELOG.md updated with changes
✅ .env.example includes new variables
✅ Migration instructions provided (if needed)
✅ Deployment notes added (if needed)

User-Facing Documentation:
✅ Usage examples provided
✅ Common use cases documented
✅ Troubleshooting section added

Step 7: Code Quality Verification

Final quality checks:

Code Quality Checklist:

Security:
✅ No SQL injection vulnerabilities
✅ No XSS vulnerabilities
✅ No hardcoded secrets
✅ Authentication/authorization correct
✅ Input validation comprehensive
✅ OWASP Top 10 checked

Performance:
✅ No N+1 query problems
✅ Appropriate database indexes
✅ Efficient algorithms used
✅ Caching implemented where needed
✅ No performance regressions

Best Practices:
✅ DRY principle followed (no duplication)
✅ SOLID principles applied
✅ Consistent naming conventions
✅ Proper error handling
✅ Logging appropriate
✅ No commented-out code
✅ No debugging statements (console.log, dd(), etc.)

Step 8: Git Verification

Verify version control state:

Git Status Check:

✅ All changes are committed
✅ Commit messages follow conventions
✅ Branch is up to date with base branch
✅ No merge conflicts
✅ .gitignore properly configured
✅ No sensitive files committed

Git log (last commits):
[Show last 3-5 commits with messages]

Step 9: Deployment Verification

Verify deployment readiness:

Deployment Checklist:

✅ Environment variables documented
✅ Database migrations are reversible
✅ No breaking changes (or documented)
✅ Rollback plan exists
✅ Health check endpoints work
✅ CI/CD pipeline passes (if configured)

Migration Commands (if needed):
1. [Command 1]
2. [Command 2]

Rollback Commands (if needed):
1. [Command 1]
2. [Command 2]

Step 10: Final Approval

Present complete verification report:

Verification Complete ✅

✅ All requirements met
✅ All tests pass ([X] tests)
✅ No regressions detected
✅ Documentation complete
✅ Code quality verified
✅ Security checked
✅ Performance validated
✅ Git state clean
✅ Deployment ready

The [feature name] is complete and ready for [deployment/merge/review].

If issues found:

Verification Found Issues ⚠️

Issues preventing completion:
1. [Critical issue 1]
2. [Critical issue 2]

I need to address these before declaring complete.

Complete Verification Checklist

Use this comprehensive checklist:

Requirements

All original requirements met
All "and also" requests addressed
Implied requirements handled
User expectations met

Functionality

Testing

Integration

Documentation

Code Quality

Version Control

Deployment

Environment variables documented
Migrations reversible
Rollback plan exists
CI/CD passes

Red Flags (Incomplete Work)

❌ "Just need to test one more thing" → Test it NOW
❌ "I'll document it later" → Document NOW
❌ Skipped tests → Fix them NOW
❌ "It works on my machine" → Verify in clean environment
❌ Uncommitted changes → Commit NOW
❌ "I'll fix that typo later" → Fix NOW

Common Rationalizations to Reject

❌ "It's good enough" → Verify it's complete
❌ "The user just wants it working" → Professional quality still matters
❌ "I'm out of time" → Better to deliver late and complete than early and broken
❌ "I'll fix issues if they come up" → Fix known issues NOW
❌ "Documentation can wait" → Document before you forget

Example Verifications

Example 1: Complete Feature

I'm using the verification-before-completion skill for the user authentication feature.

Original Request:
"Add authentication to the API with email/password login, social OAuth, and protected routes"

Requirements Checklist:
✅ Email/password registration - Implemented
✅ Email/password login - Implemented
✅ Token-based authentication - Implemented (Sanctum)
✅ Social OAuth (Google, GitHub) - Implemented (Clerk)
✅ Protected routes - Implemented (auth:sanctum middleware)
✅ Logout functionality - Implemented

End-to-End Testing:

Scenario 1: Registration and Login
1. POST /register with email/password → ✅ Returns 201, user created
2. POST /login with credentials → ✅ Returns token
3. GET /user (protected) with token → ✅ Returns user data

Scenario 2: Social OAuth
1. GET /auth/redirect/google → ✅ Redirects to Google
2. Callback returns with user → ✅ User created/logged in
3. Token issued → ✅ Works

Scenario 3: Protected Routes
1. GET /user without token → ✅ Returns 401
2. GET /user with invalid token → ✅ Returns 401
3. GET /user with valid token → ✅ Returns 200

Scenario 4: Error Handling
1. Register with invalid email → ✅ Returns 422 with validation errors
2. Login with wrong password → ✅ Returns 401 with clear message
3. Login with non-existent email → ✅ Returns 401 with clear message

Test Verification:

Before running tests:
✅ Using database-backup skill
✅ Backup created: backups/database_2025-01-06_15-30-00.sql

Running complete test suite:
Command: ./scripts/safe-test.sh vendor/bin/paratest
Results:
- Total: 127 tests
- Passed: 127 tests
- Failed: 0 tests
- Duration: 8.2s
- Coverage: 87%

✅ All tests pass

Running authentication tests specifically:
Command: ./scripts/safe-test.sh vendor/bin/paratest --filter=Authentication
Results:
- Total: 15 tests
- Passed: 15 tests
- Failed: 0 tests

✅ Feature tests pass

Integration Verification:

✅ No existing functionality broken (regression tests passed)
✅ API contracts maintained (backwards compatible)
✅ Database migrations applied: users table, personal_access_tokens table
✅ Migrations can be rolled back: php artisan migrate:rollback
✅ No conflicts with other features
✅ Environment variables: CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY, CLERK_SECRET_KEY added to .env.example
✅ Dependencies: laravel/sanctum, clerk/clerk-sdk-php added

Documentation Verification:

Code Documentation:
✅ AuthController methods have comprehensive PHPDoc
✅ Complex OAuth logic has explanatory comments
✅ Type hints on all function parameters

API Documentation:
✅ OpenAPI documentation generated: /docs/api
✅ All endpoints documented:
   - POST /register
   - POST /login
   - POST /logout
   - GET /auth/redirect/{provider}
   - GET /auth/callback/{provider}
✅ Request/response examples provided for each
✅ Authentication requirements: "Bearer token required for protected routes"
✅ Error responses documented (401, 422, 500)

Project Documentation:
✅ README.md updated with authentication setup section
✅ CHANGELOG.md updated:
   - Added: Token-based authentication with Sanctum
   - Added: Social OAuth with Clerk (Google, GitHub)
   - Added: Protected route middleware
✅ .env.example includes CLERK_* variables
✅ Migration instructions in README: php artisan migrate
✅ Deployment notes: Clerk keys must be set in production

User-Facing Documentation:
✅ Usage examples in README:
   - How to register a user
   - How to login
   - How to use tokens
   - How to add social OAuth
✅ Common use cases documented
✅ Troubleshooting section added:
   - Token not working → Check Sanctum middleware
   - OAuth callback fails → Verify Clerk configuration

Code Quality Verification:

Security:
✅ Passwords hashed with bcrypt (Laravel default)
✅ SQL injection: Using Eloquent ORM (parameterized)
✅ XSS: No raw output, API returns JSON
✅ No hardcoded secrets (all in .env)
✅ Authentication: Sanctum properly configured
✅ Authorization: Middleware on protected routes
✅ Input validation: FormRequest classes with rules
✅ Rate limiting: 5 login attempts per minute per IP

Performance:
✅ No N+1 queries (eager loading used)
✅ Database indexes: index on users.email
✅ Token lookup optimized
✅ Caching: Not needed for auth (stateless tokens)
✅ No performance regressions

Best Practices:
✅ DRY: AuthController methods reuse validation logic
✅ SOLID: Single responsibility per method
✅ Naming: Clear, consistent (login, register, logout)
✅ Error handling: Try-catch for OAuth, clear error messages
✅ Logging: Failed login attempts logged
✅ No commented-out code
✅ No debugging statements (removed all dd(), var_dump())

Git Verification:

✅ All changes committed (3 commits)
✅ Commit messages:
   - "Add Laravel Sanctum token authentication"
   - "Add Clerk social OAuth integration"
   - "Add authentication tests and documentation"
✅ Branch 'feature/authentication' up to date with main
✅ No merge conflicts
✅ .gitignore includes .env (secrets not committed)
✅ No sensitive files in history

Deployment Verification:

✅ Environment variables documented in .env.example
✅ Database migrations reversible:
   - Rollback: php artisan migrate:rollback
   - Steps: 2 migrations to rollback
✅ No breaking changes (new feature, existing routes unchanged)
✅ Rollback plan:
   1. php artisan migrate:rollback --step=2
   2. composer remove laravel/sanctum clerk/clerk-sdk-php
   3. Remove routes from api.php
   4. Remove AuthController

Migration Commands:
1. php artisan migrate

Rollback Commands:
1. php artisan migrate:rollback --step=2

---

Verification Complete ✅

✅ All requirements met (email/password + social OAuth)
✅ All tests pass (127 tests, 15 auth tests)
✅ No regressions detected
✅ Documentation complete (code, API, project, user)
✅ Code quality verified (security, performance, best practices)
✅ Security checked (OWASP Top 10)
✅ Performance validated (no N+1, proper indexes)
✅ Git state clean (3 commits, good messages)
✅ Deployment ready (migrations, rollback plan)

The user authentication feature is complete and ready for deployment/merge.

Example 2: Issues Found

I'm using the verification-before-completion skill for the activity logging feature.

Original Request:
"Track user activity in a database table including IP address and user agent"

Requirements Checklist:
✅ Activity logging database table
✅ Logs user registration
✅ Logs user login
✅ Logs user logout
✅ Captures IP address
✅ Captures user agent

End-to-End Testing:
✅ User registration creates log entry with IP and user agent
✅ User login creates log entry
✅ User logout creates log entry

Test Verification:

Before running tests:
✅ Using database-backup skill
✅ Backup created

Running tests:
❌ FAILED - 2 test failures

Failed tests:
1. ActivityLogTest::test_logging_includes_user_agent
   - Expected: User agent to be captured
   - Actual: user_agent column is NULL
   - Reason: ActivityLogger not capturing user agent correctly

2. ActivityLogTest::test_user_can_view_own_activity
   - Expected: GET /user/activity returns activity logs
   - Actual: 404 Not Found
   - Reason: Forgot to implement the viewing endpoint

Verification Found Issues ⚠️

Critical Issues (preventing completion):
1. User agent not being captured
   - Tests expect it, code doesn't capture it
   - Fix: Update ActivityLogger to use $request->userAgent()

2. Missing endpoint to view activity logs
   - User probably wants to see their activity
   - This is an implied requirement
   - Fix: Add GET /user/activity endpoint

I need to fix these issues before declaring complete.

After fixing:

Fixed issues:
✅ Updated ActivityLogger to capture user agent correctly
✅ Added GET /user/activity endpoint
✅ Added test for new endpoint
✅ All tests now pass (18 tests)

Re-running verification:
✅ All requirements met (including implied requirement)
✅ All tests pass
✅ End-to-end testing successful
✅ Documentation updated

Verification Complete ✅ - Activity logging is now complete and ready.

Integration with Other Skills

Before verification-before-completion: Use code-review skill After verification-before-completion: Ready to commit/deploy If issues found: Fix and re-verify

Authority

This skill is based on:

Software engineering best practice: Quality gates
Professional standard: Definition of "done"
Agile methodology: Acceptance criteria
Empirical evidence: Final verification catches 40% of remaining issues

Social Proof: Professional teams have explicit "definition of done" checklists. No code is "complete" without verification.

Your Commitment

Before using this skill, confirm:

I will NEVER declare work complete without verification
I will CHECK every item in the verification checklist
I will RUN all tests as part of verification
I will FIX any issues found
I will DOCUMENT verification results

Bottom Line: "Complete" means fully verified, tested, documented, and ready to deploy. Never declare done without proving it's done.

Name	verification-before-completion
Description	Use when finishing any task. Final checklist before marking complete. Ensures nothing forgotten, all tests pass, documentation updated.

verification-before-completion

SKILL.md