manuscript-writing
Structure academic research papers using IMRaD format. Use when writing research manuscripts, organizing paper sections, drafting abstracts, or constructing titles. Works well with human-writing and scientific-style skills.
SKILL.md
| Name | manuscript-writing |
| Description | Structure academic research papers using IMRaD format. Use when writing research manuscripts, organizing paper sections, drafting abstracts, or constructing titles. Works well with human-writing and scientific-style skills. |
name: manuscript-writing description: Structure academic research papers using IMRaD format. Use when writing research manuscripts, organizing paper sections, drafting abstracts, or constructing titles. Works well with human-writing and scientific-style skills. argument-hint: [paper topic or section to write]
Manuscript Writing Guide
This guide covers the structure and organization of academic research papers following the IMRaD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion).
When to Use This Skill
- Starting a new research paper
- Organizing existing research into manuscript form
- Writing or revising specific sections
- Drafting abstracts and titles
Combine with: human-writing for prose style, scientific-style for citations and hedging.
IMRaD Overview
| Section | Purpose | Tense | Typical Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | Attract readers, convey main finding | N/A | 10-15 words |
| Abstract | Summarize entire paper | Mixed | 150-300 words |
| Introduction | Why this study matters | Present/Past | 10-15% |
| Methods | How study was done | Past | 15-20% |
| Results | What was found | Past | 25-30% |
| Discussion | What it means | Present/Past | 25-30% |
Title Construction
Strong titles follow these patterns:
Declarative (states the finding):
- "Gene X regulates metabolic pathway Y in species Z"
- Best for clear, significant results
Descriptive (states the topic):
- "Regulation of metabolic pathway Y in species Z"
- Best when results are complex or exploratory
Question (poses the research question):
- "Does gene X regulate metabolic pathway Y?"
- Use sparingly; can seem uncertain
Title Checklist
- Contains key terms for searchability
- Avoids abbreviations (except universally known ones)
- No colons unless necessary for subtitles
- Specific enough to distinguish from similar papers
- Accurate representation of content
Section-by-Section Guidance
Introduction
Goal: Move from broad context to specific research question.
Structure (funnel shape):
- Opening hook - Why does this topic matter?
- Background - What do we already know?
- Gap - What remains unknown?
- Objective - What does this study address?
- Approach - How did you address it? (brief)
Common mistakes:
- Too much background, too little gap identification
- Burying the research question
- Citing exhaustively rather than selectively
- No clear statement of objectives
Methods
Goal: Enable replication.
Key principles:
- Describe what you did, not why
- Use past tense throughout
- Include enough detail for replication
- Cite established protocols rather than re-describing
Standard subsections:
- Study design/overview
- Participants/samples
- Data collection/procedures
- Data analysis
- Ethics statement (if applicable)
Results
Goal: Report findings without interpretation.
Key principles:
- Lead with most important findings
- State results, then reference supporting figure/table
- Report effect sizes, not just significance
- Present results systematically (by hypothesis, by variable, etc.)
Structure each paragraph:
- Topic sentence stating the result
- Supporting statistics
- Reference to figure or table
Discussion
Goal: Interpret findings and place in context.
Structure:
- Summary - Restate key findings (1-2 sentences)
- Interpretation - What do results mean?
- Context - How do they fit existing literature?
- Implications - Why do they matter?
- Limitations - What are the caveats?
- Future directions - What comes next?
- Conclusion - Final take-home message
Common mistakes:
- Repeating results without interpretation
- Overstating conclusions
- Ignoring contradictory literature
- Limitations section that undermines the entire study
Abstract Types
See ABSTRACT_TEMPLATES.md for templates.
Structured abstract (with headings):
- Background/Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Conclusions
Unstructured abstract (single paragraph):
- Same content, flowing prose
- Typically follows same order
Key Transitions
See SECTION_TRANSITIONS.md for phrases to move between sections.
Quality Checks
Before submission, verify each section:
- Title - Searchable, accurate, appropriate length
- Abstract - Stands alone, within word limit, no citations
- Introduction - Clear gap and objectives
- Methods - Replicable, complete, properly cited
- Results - Systematic, properly referenced figures/tables
- Discussion - Interprets (not repeats), acknowledges limitations
Related Files
- IMRAD_STRUCTURE.md - Detailed checklists for each section
- ABSTRACT_TEMPLATES.md - Templates with word budgets
- SECTION_TRANSITIONS.md - Transition phrases